The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -4.5.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -4.5, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-4.5
#340
42.4
#46
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 Tiny · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is licensed under deepseek, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 21 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

1 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to -4.5. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 Tiny compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.5 vs 42.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons