The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 vs QvQ-72B-Preview

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 7.9 to 2.9.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 7.9 to 2.9, ranking #290 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, QvQ-72B-Preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 7.9 and ranks #290 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.9
#319
7.9
#290
-1.9
#337
8.2
#283
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
129,280
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek VL2
QvQ-72B-Preview
2.1#174
6.3#154
5.1#144
9.6#125
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

2 shared

DeepSeek VL2 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QvQ-72B-Preview is better at 2 benchmarks (MathVista, MMMU).

QvQ-72B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

46.4B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 46.4B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2, making it 171.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies input context (129,280 tokens). Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies output context (129,280 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek VL2 and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 0 month newer than DeepSeek VL2.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.8 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or QvQ-72B-Preview?

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 7.9 to 2.9. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and QvQ-72B-Preview?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.9 vs 7.9), licensing (deepseek vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and QvQ-72B-Preview?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.