The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct are closely matched at 3.0 and 2.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 3.0 and 2.1.

DeepSeek VL2 also accepts a larger context window (129,280 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 129,280 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.0
#309
2.1
#315
-1.8
#327
2.1
#305
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
129,280
128,000

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.0B diff

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has 5.0B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2, making it 18.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek VL2 accepts 129,280 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek VL2 can generate longer responses up to 129,280 tokens, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct does not.

DeepSeek VL2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

DeepSeek VL2 is 3 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

2mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks.

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.09/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 3.0 and 2.1. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.0 vs 2.1), context window (129K vs 128K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (deepseek vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.