The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 2.0.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 2.0, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
2.0
#317
Reasoning
50.5
#12
2.0
#307
Coding
36.2
#22
10.0
#166
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

712.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 712.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 2225.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Atria Dawn Preview is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

4 days ago

2.0yr newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 2.0. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 2.0), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons