The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs Sarvam-105B

Sarvam-105B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 19.4.

Google · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Sarvam-105B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 19.4, ranking #152 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-105B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 25.7 and ranks #152 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.4
#204
25.7
#152
19.1
#201
26.2
#147
0.5
#170
5.6
#144
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
Sarvam-105B
17.6#192
29.1#88
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B · 14 for Sarvam-105B

4 shared

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Sarvam-105B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro).

Sarvam-105B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

79.8B diff

Sarvam-105B has 79.8B more parameters than DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B, making it 316.7% larger.

Google
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
25.2Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
25.2B
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B was released on 2026-06-10, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is 3 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Jun 10, 2026

3 months ago

3mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Sarvam-105B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Sarvam-105B's cutoff date.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

Jan 2025

Sarvam-105B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or Sarvam-105B?

Sarvam-105B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 19.4. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is made by Google and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B scores MMMLU: 81.5%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%, GPQA: 73.2%, MathVision: 70.5%, AIME 2026: 69.1%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the main differences between DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.4 vs 25.7), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B and Sarvam-105B?

DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is developed by Google and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.