The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 4.5 vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B leads the LLM Stats Score 14.9 to -13.3.

Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

QwQ-32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 14.9 to -13.3, ranking #220 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 4.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 4.5

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose QwQ-32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 14.9 and ranks #220 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-13.3
#357
14.9
#220
-13.2
#350
15.7
#211
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 4.5
QwQ-32B
-15.9#318
18.1#177
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for ERNIE 4.5 · 7 for QwQ-32B

1 shared

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.5B diff

QwQ-32B has 11.5B more parameters than ERNIE 4.5, making it 54.8% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
21.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
21.0B
ERNIE 4.5
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only ERNIE 4.5 specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

ERNIE 4.5 is 4 months newer than QwQ-32B.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

3mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B leads the LLM Stats Score 14.9 to -13.3. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and QwQ-32B?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 4.5 and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-13.3 vs 14.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and QwQ-32B?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.