The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.0 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 33.6.

Baidu · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 33.6, ranking #39 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.0

  • you are already invested in the Baidu ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.4 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
33.6
#92
43.4
#39
33.1
#90
45.1
#28
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$2.50 / M
Output price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
30.9#69
42.1#5
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for ERNIE 5.0 · 20 for Gemini 3.1 Pro

2 shared

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both ERNIE 5.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2026-01-22, while Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1 month newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2026

7 months ago

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

6 months ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.0

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.0
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.0 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 33.6. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.0 compare to Gemini 3.1 Pro in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.6 vs 43.4). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google.