Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Magistral Medium

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Magistral Medium is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both ERNIE 5.0 and Magistral Medium support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2026-01-22, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

ERNIE 5.0 is 8 months newer than Magistral Medium.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2026

2 months ago

7mo newer
Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.0

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AIME 2025 score (87.0% vs 64.9%)
Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 70.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.0% vs 9.0%)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Magistral Medium

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.