Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

ERNIE 5.0 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

ERNIE 5.0 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2025-01-22, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

ERNIE 5.0 is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 36.4%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.0% vs 56.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.
ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.