The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are closely matched at 33.4 and 35.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 33.4 and 35.0.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.0

  • you are already invested in the Baidu ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
33.4
#98
35.0
#88
33.0
#98
35.5
#79
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.29 / M
Output price
— / M
$2.40 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
31.0#71
36.1#41
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for ERNIE 5.0 · 81 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

3 shared

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2026-01-22, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 1 month newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2026

7 months ago

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 24, 2026

6 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.0
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.0 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 33.4 and 35.0. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.0 compare to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores CountBench: 97.0%, VLMsAreBlind: 96.7%, MMLU-Redux: 94.0%, IFEval: 93.4%, AI2D: 93.3%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.4 vs 35.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.0 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.