ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs LongCat-2.5
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and LongCat-2.5 are closely matched at 52.3 and 49.4 on the LLM Stats Score. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Baidu · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and LongCat-2.5 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 52.3 and 49.4.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose LongCat-2.5
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 23 for LongCat-2.5
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview outperforms in 5 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, MCP Atlas, NL2Repo, SpreadsheetBench 2, Terminal-Bench 4.0), while LongCat-2.5 is better at 1 benchmark (BrowseComp).
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, LongCat-2.5 is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
LongCat-2.5 has 1320.0B more parameters than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview, making it 471.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while LongCat-2.5 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
LongCat-2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.
LongCat-2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
LongCat-2.5
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 0 month newer than LongCat-2.5.
Nov 11, 2026
1 days ago
1w newerNov 1, 2026
1 weeks ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
LongCat-2.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs LongCat-2.5.