The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -5.3. Mistral NeMo Instruct is 22.6x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -5.3, ranking #13 overall.

On price, Mistral NeMo Instruct is roughly 22.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 22.6x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
-5.3
#399
Reasoning
50.7
#12
-5.5
#392
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$0.03 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 8 for Mistral NeMo Instruct

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral NeMo Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 14.7x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.02/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 37.7x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.03/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.03
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

268.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 268.0B more parameters than Mistral NeMo Instruct, making it 2233.3% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral NeMo Instruct's 131,072 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Mistral NeMo Instruct is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 28 months newer than Mistral NeMo Instruct.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

2.3yr newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

2.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Google, Mistral AI.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.03/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral NeMo Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -5.3. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Mistral NeMo Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Mistral NeMo Instruct in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 14.7x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.02/M input and $0.03/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -5.3), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.02/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons