The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs QwQ-32B

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 14.1.

Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 14.1, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
14.1
#280
Reasoning
50.7
#12
15.0
#268
Coding
37.9
#20
10.2
#202
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 7 for QwQ-32B

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

247.5B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 247.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 761.5% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Nov 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 21 months newer than QwQ-32B.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

2 days ago

1.7yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or QwQ-32B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 14.1. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and QwQ-32B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 14.1), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and QwQ-32B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons