The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 26.3.

LG AI Research · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 26.3, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you are already invested in the LG AI Research ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
LG AI Research
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
26.3
#141
42.4
#46
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for EXAONE 4.5 33B · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

EXAONE 4.5 33B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 5 months newer than EXAONE 4.5 33B.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

4 months ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm EXAONE 4.5 33B's training data extends to 2024-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 26.3. EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does EXAONE 4.5 33B compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the main differences between EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.3 vs 42.4), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes EXAONE 4.5 33B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons