The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GPT-6 Cyber

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 25.2.

LG AI Research · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 25.2, ranking #79 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you are already invested in the LG AI Research ecosystem

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #79 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
25.2
#192
41.0
#79
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$100.00 / M
Context window
—
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for EXAONE 4.5 33B · 1 for GPT-6 Cyber

No common benchmarks found

EXAONE 4.5 33B and GPT-6 Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both EXAONE 4.5 33B and GPT-6 Cyber support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09, while GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05.

GPT-6 Cyber is 7 months newer than EXAONE 4.5 33B.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

7 months ago

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

4 days ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while GPT-6 Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm EXAONE 4.5 33B's training data extends to 2024-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-6 Cyber's cutoff date.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

GPT-6 Cyber

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against EXAONE 4.5 33B and GPT-6 Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GPT-6 Cyber.

Which is better, EXAONE 4.5 33B or GPT-6 Cyber?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 25.2. EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research and GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does EXAONE 4.5 33B compare to GPT-6 Cyber in benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%. GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%.

What are the context window sizes for EXAONE 4.5 33B and GPT-6 Cyber?

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between EXAONE 4.5 33B and GPT-6 Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.2 vs 41.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes EXAONE 4.5 33B and GPT-6 Cyber?

EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research and GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI.