The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 26.3.

LG AI Research · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 26.3, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you are already invested in the LG AI Research ecosystem

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
26.3
#141
51.1
#14
26.9
#134
50.7
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Hy4 preview
29.1#85
39.4#17
11.6#109
31.1#10
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for EXAONE 4.5 33B · 32 for Hy4 preview

1 shared

EXAONE 4.5 33B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy4 preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

737.0B diff

Hy4 preview has 737.0B more parameters than EXAONE 4.5 33B, making it 2233.3% larger.

LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
33.0Bparameters
Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
33.0B
EXAONE 4.5 33B
770.0B
Hy4 preview

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

EXAONE 4.5 33B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

EXAONE 4.5 33B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy4 preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09, while Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28.

Hy4 preview is 5 months newer than EXAONE 4.5 33B.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

4 months ago

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm EXAONE 4.5 33B's training data extends to 2024-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

Hy4 preview

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against EXAONE 4.5 33B and Hy4 preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
✓ Preferred
Hy4 preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy4 preview.

Which is better, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 26.3. EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research and Hy4 preview is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does EXAONE 4.5 33B compare to Hy4 preview in benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%. Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%.

What are the main differences between EXAONE 4.5 33B and Hy4 preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.3 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes EXAONE 4.5 33B and Hy4 preview?

EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research and Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent.