The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -0.6.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -0.6, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.7 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.6
#317
42.7
#44
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 30 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -0.6. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.6 vs 42.7), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons