The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 6.0 to -4.8. Mistral NeMo Instruct is 12.1x cheaper per token.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 1.5 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 6.0 to -4.8, ranking #299 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 1.5 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Mistral NeMo Instruct is roughly 12.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 1.5 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 6.0 and ranks #299 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 12.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash
Google
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
6.0
#299
-4.8
#359
Reasoning
5.6
#297
-5.0
#351
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.15 / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
$0.03 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Finance
5.7#167
-8.1#222
Legal
5.7#154
-8.1#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash · 8 for Mistral NeMo Instruct

2 shared

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HellaSwag, MMLU), while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 7.9x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.02/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.03/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Flash is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerGoogle
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.03
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral NeMo Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 3 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.4 years ago

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

2.2 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Mistral NeMo Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Google, Mistral AI.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.03/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash and Mistral NeMo Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 6.0 to -4.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash compare to Mistral NeMo Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, FLEURS: 90.4%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash cheaper than Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 7.9x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via google. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.02/M input and $0.03/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (6.0 vs -4.8), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.02/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons