The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 11.8. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is 31.4x cheaper per token.

Google · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 11.8, ranking #5 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is roughly 31.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

  • cost matters — it's about 31.4x cheaper per token

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Google
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
11.8
#287
55.5
#5
Reasoning
12.0
#279
54.3
#6
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.07 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Math
18.1#200
38.6#26
Vision
1.4#202
40.5#4
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite · 30 for Kimi K3.1 Pro

1 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3.1 Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite ($0.07/1M tokens) is 28.6x cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens) is 33.3x cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K3.1 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-02-05, while Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23.

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 21 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2025

1.7 years ago

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Oct 23, 2026

2 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Kimi K3.1 Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K3.1 Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Jun 2024

Kimi K3.1 Pro

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Kimi K3.1 Pro

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 11.8. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Kimi K3.1 Pro is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite compare to Kimi K3.1 Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores MATH: 86.8%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 78.2%, MMLU-Pro: 71.6%, MMMU: 68.0%. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores BabyVision: 95.4%, GPQA: 94.2%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 92.7%, BrowseComp: 92.1%, Chartography: 90.2%.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is 28.6x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google. Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via moonshot.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.8 vs 55.5), input pricing ($0.07 vs $2.00/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Kimi K3.1 Pro is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons