The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs LongCat-2.5

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 11.8. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is 4.1x cheaper per token.

Google · Meituan · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 11.8, ranking #20 overall.

On price, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is roughly 4.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

  • cost matters — it's about 4.1x cheaper per token

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Google
LongCat-2.5
Meituan
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
11.8
#291
50.0
#20
Reasoning
11.9
#283
48.3
#21
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.07 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LongCat-2.5
Math
18.1#201
37.2#37
Vision
1.4#203
32.5#29
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite · 23 for LongCat-2.5

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite ($0.07/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-2.5 is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. LongCat-2.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-02-05, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.

LongCat-2.5 is 21 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2025

1.7 years ago

LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

3 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while LongCat-2.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-2.5's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Jun 2024

LongCat-2.5

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is available from Google. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

LongCat-2.5

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
LongCat-2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs LongCat-2.5.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or LongCat-2.5?

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 11.8. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is made by Google and LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite compare to LongCat-2.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores MATH: 86.8%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 78.2%, MMLU-Pro: 71.6%, MMMU: 68.0%. LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite cheaper than LongCat-2.5?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is 4.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google. LongCat-2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and LongCat-2.5?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and LongCat-2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.8 vs 50.0), input pricing ($0.07 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and LongCat-2.5?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan.

Related comparisons