The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.0 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 16.5 to -4.7. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 142.9x cheaper per token.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.5 to -4.7, ranking #221 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.0 Flash wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 2.0 Flash is roughly 142.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.0 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.5 and ranks #221 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 142.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
16.5
#221
-4.7
#350
Reasoning
15.8
#220
-5.5
#349
Coding
1.7
#229
-0.1
#242
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$0.10 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$40.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
32,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Math
23.4#130
-1.8#306
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash · 18 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

4 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HiddenMath, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 200.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 7 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.8 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

2 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 2.0 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 16.5 to -4.7. Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 200.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.5 vs -4.7), context window (1.0M vs 32K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons