The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -4.7.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -4.7, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
-4.7
#350
Reasoning
50.5
#12
-5.5
#349
Coding
36.2
#22
-0.1
#242
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$40.00 / M
Context window
—
32,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 18 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3n E4B Instructeddon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

736.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 736.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 9200.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Atria Dawn Preview is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date.

Atria Dawn Preview

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -4.7. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -4.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.

Related comparisons