Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 15.9. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 22.9x cheaper per token.
Google · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 15.9, ranking #5 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 2.0 Flash is roughly 22.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 22.9x cheaper per token
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash · 30 for Kimi K3.1 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3.1 Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 20.0x cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01, while Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23.
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 23 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash.
Dec 1, 2024
1.9 years ago
Oct 23, 2026
3 days ago
1.9yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Kimi K3.1 Pro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K3.1 Pro's cutoff date.
Aug 2024
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro.