The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 10.7.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 10.7, ranking #157 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #157 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
10.7
#249
24.0
#157
Reasoning
11.2
#244
21.8
#166
Coding
-2.5
#237
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Math
4.2#276
25.5#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

3 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 14 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

1.2 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 10.7. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.7 vs 24.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons