The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 10.4. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 10.4, ranking #189 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

  • cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.1 and ranks #189 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
10.4
#264
21.1
#189
Reasoning
10.9
#258
21.1
#182
Coding
-2.8
#251
12.3
#149
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite · 10 for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

2 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 5 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

1.3 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 10.4. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.4 vs 21.1), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons