The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 58.2 to 20.6. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 42.1x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Astra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 58.2 to 20.6, ranking #3 overall.

On price, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is roughly 42.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Astra also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Astra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 58.2 and ranks #3 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 42.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
58.2
#3
20.6
#215
Reasoning
57.3
#2
20.7
#207
Coding
46.4
#3
11.9
#172
Agents
45.0
#2
5.2
#168
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$10.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,050,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-6 Astra
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Tool use
36.9#1
12.3#122
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for GPT-6 Astra · 10 for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Astra ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Astra ($50.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Astra is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Oct 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Astra accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-6 Astra is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Oct 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Astra supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

GPT-6 Astra can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Astra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6 Astra is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Astra was released on 2026-09-04, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

GPT-6 Astra is 19 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

GPT-6 Astra

Sep 4, 2026

1 months ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Astra has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-30, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Astra's training data extends to 2026-04-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Astra

Apr 2026

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Astra is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-6 Astra

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Astra
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 58.2 to 20.6. GPT-6 Astra is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Astra compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores ExploitBench: 100.0%, ARC-AGI-3: 99.9%, ARC-AGI: 98.5%, FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): 97.6%, GPQA: 96.0%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

Is GPT-6 Astra cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 33.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via openai. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

GPT-6 Astra supports 1.1M tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (58.2 vs 20.6), context window (1.1M vs 262K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

GPT-6 Astra is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons