Gemini 2.5 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 21.1. LongCat-2.5 is 1.6x cheaper per token.
Google · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 21.1, ranking #20 overall.
On price, LongCat-2.5 is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output
Choose LongCat-2.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
14 reported for Gemini 2.5 Flash · 23 for LongCat-2.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 2.1x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Flash is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while LongCat-2.5 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
LongCat-2.5
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.
LongCat-2.5 is 18 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.
May 20, 2025
1.4 years ago
Nov 1, 2026
-1 days ago
1.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while LongCat-2.5's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-2.5's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
LongCat-2.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs LongCat-2.5.