The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.0 to -10.3.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 30.0 to -10.3, ranking #111 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

  • overall performance matters — it scores 30.0 and ranks #111 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
30.0
#111
-10.3
#351
Reasoning
28.4
#116
-10.8
#343
Coding
17.0
#112
-4.3
#243
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Math
22.2#132
-7.6#313
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 · 18 for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

4 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies output context (65,535 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

7 mo newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.0 to -10.3. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.0 vs -10.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons