Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies output context (65,535 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

11 months ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

7 mo newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (88.0% vs 6.7%)
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (89.2% vs 59.0%)
Higher GPQA score (86.4% vs 24.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (69.0% vs 13.2%)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.