The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 30.0. Qwen3.8 Flash is 14.9x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 30.0, ranking #16 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3.8 Flash is roughly 14.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 14.9x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Google
Qwen3.8 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
30.0
#111
49.6
#16
Reasoning
28.4
#116
49.2
#16
Coding
17.0
#112
36.6
#20
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3.8 Flash
Math
22.2#132
32.6#55
Vision
19.1#69
34.4#13
Multimodal
25.1#44
36.2#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

2 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Qwen3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 21.3x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.47/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.47
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.8 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is limited to 65,535 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3.8 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 15 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.8 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

Qwen3.8 Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google. Qwen3.8 Flash is available from Novita.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3.8 Flash

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.47/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 30.0. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.0 vs 49.6), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is developed by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons