The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -10.3.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -10.3, ranking #156 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-10.3
#351
24.0
#156
-10.8
#343
21.8
#165
-4.3
#243
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
-7.6#313
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

3 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 22.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed, making it 275.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -10.3. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.3 vs 24.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.