Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, t2-bench), while Gemma 4 E4B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemma 4 E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 4 E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Flash and Gemma 4 E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 4 E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 4 E4B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 4 E4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Gemma 4 E4B was released on 2026-04-02.

Gemma 4 E4B is 4 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

4 months ago

Gemma 4 E4B

Apr 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemma 4 E4B has a cutoff of 2025-01-01.

Gemini 3 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 4 E4B (2025-01-01).

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Gemma 4 E4B

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 58.6%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.8% vs 76.6%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.2% vs 52.6%)
Higher t2-bench score (90.2% vs 57.5%)
Google
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Google
Gemma 4 E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Gemma 4 E4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Gemma 4 E4B scores MMMLU: 76.6%, MMLU-Pro: 69.4%, MathVision: 59.5%, GPQA: 58.6%, t2-bench: 57.5%.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 4 E4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.