Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-5.1 ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is 3.1x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-5.1 Thinking — which is better?
Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and GPT-5.1 Thinking (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-5.1 Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 3 Flash is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Choose GPT-5.1 Thinking if…
- you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-5.1 Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than GPT-5.1 Thinking ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than GPT-5.1 Thinking ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-5.1 Thinking is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT-5.1 Thinking's 400,000 tokens. GPT-5.1 Thinking can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-5.1 Thinking support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Flash
GPT-5.1 Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while GPT-5.1 Thinking was released on 2025-11-12.
Gemini 3 Flash is 1 month newer than GPT-5.1 Thinking.
Dec 17, 2025
5 months ago
1mo newerNov 12, 2025
7 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GPT-5.1 Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.1 Thinking's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. GPT-5.1 Thinking is available from OpenAI.
Gemini 3 Flash
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-5.1 Thinking.