Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)Which is better in 2026?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 10.7x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) — which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) (by NVIDIA) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is roughly 10.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) if…

  • cost matters — it's about 10.7x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Gemini 3 Flash is 0 month newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

2d newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a cutoff of 2025-11-28.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has more recent training data (up to 2025-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3 Flash (2025-01-31).

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

10 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 99.2%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 75.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 15.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 38.8%)
NVIDIA
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons