Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 10.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Gemini 3 Flash is 0 month newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

3 months ago

2d newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a cutoff of 2025-11-28.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has more recent training data (up to 2025-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3 Flash (2025-01-31).

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

10 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 99.2%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 75.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 15.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 38.8%)
NVIDIA
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via deepinfra.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.