Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)Which is better in 2026?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 14.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) (by NVIDIA) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is roughly 14.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) if…

  • cost matters — it's about 14.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

712.0B diff

GLM-5 has 712.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B), making it 2225.0% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

GLM-5 is 2 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

1mo newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while GLM-5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5's cutoff date.

GLM-5

—

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.8% vs 38.8%)
NVIDIA
Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, GLM-5 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 16.7x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.06/M), licensing (MIT vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons