Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs ERNIE 5.0Which is better in 2026?

Gemini 3 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Pro vs ERNIE 5.0 — which is better?

Gemini 3 Pro (by Google) and ERNIE 5.0 (by Baidu) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while ERNIE 5.0 is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleQA). Gemini 3 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks

Choose ERNIE 5.0 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2026
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while ERNIE 5.0 is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleQA).

Gemini 3 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Jun 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jun 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Pro and ERNIE 5.0 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2026-01-22.

ERNIE 5.0 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3 Pro.

Gemini 3 Pro

Nov 18, 2025

7 months ago

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2026

4 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Pro

Jan 2025

ERNIE 5.0

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 87.0%)
Higher GPQA score (91.9% vs 85.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (45.8% vs 39.0%)
Baidu
Higher SimpleQA score (75.0% vs 72.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Pro
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs ERNIE 5.0.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or ERNIE 5.0?

Gemini 3 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro is made by Google and ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Pro compare to ERNIE 5.0 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Global PIQA: 93.4%, GPQA: 91.9%, MMMLU: 91.8%. ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Pro and ERNIE 5.0?

Gemini 3 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemini 3 Pro and ERNIE 5.0?

Gemini 3 Pro is developed by Google and ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu.

Related comparisons