The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3 Pro vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Gemini 3 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 38.6 to 24.0.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 38.6 to 24.0, ranking #57 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3 Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 38.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3 Pro
Google
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
38.6
#57
24.0
#156
Reasoning
38.7
#55
21.8
#165
Coding
24.2
#64
9.6
#159
Agents
15.2
#76
7.9
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3 Pro
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Math
37.1#31
25.6#103
Tool use
13.5#87
10.6#116
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

21 reported for Gemini 3 Pro · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

3 shared

Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Gemini 3 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 9 months newer than Gemini 3 Pro.

Gemini 3 Pro

Nov 18, 2025

9 months ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Pro

Jan 2025

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3 Pro
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 3 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 38.6 to 24.0. Gemini 3 Pro is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3 Pro compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Global PIQA: 93.4%, GPQA: 91.9%, MMMLU: 91.8%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 3 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (38.6 vs 24.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Pro and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemini 3 Pro is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons