Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs Hermes 3 70BWhich is better in 2026?
Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Hermes 3 70B is 7.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3 Pro vs Hermes 3 70B — which is better?
Gemini 3 Pro (by Google) and Hermes 3 70B (by Nous Research) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Hermes 3 70B is roughly 7.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3 Pro if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025
Choose Hermes 3 70B if…
- cost matters — it's about 7.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 5.7x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($0.35/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 8.6x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($1.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Pro is more expensive than Hermes 3 70B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. Gemini 3 Pro can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemini 3 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.
Gemini 3 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 3 Pro
Hermes 3 70B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.
Gemini 3 Pro is 15 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Nov 18, 2025
6 months ago
1.3yr newerAug 15, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hermes 3 70B's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra.
Gemini 3 Pro
Hermes 3 70B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3 Pro
View detailsHermes 3 70B
View detailsNous Research
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs Hermes 3 70B.