Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Hermes 3 70BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GLM-5 and Hermes 3 70B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs Hermes 3 70B — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and Hermes 3 70B (by Nous Research) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Hermes 3 70B is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Hermes 3 70B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5 and Hermes 3 70B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Hermes 3 70B costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($1.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Hermes 3 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$1.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

674.0B diff

GLM-5 has 674.0B more parameters than Hermes 3 70B, making it 962.9% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
70.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
70.0B
Hermes 3 70B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input131,072 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Hermes 3 70B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.

GLM-5 is 18 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

1.5yr newer
Hermes 3 70B

Aug 15, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Hermes 3 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Nous Research
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Hermes 3 70B.

Which is better, GLM-5 or Hermes 3 70B?

GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Hermes 3 70B (Nous Research) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5 compare to Hermes 3 70B in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Hermes 3 70B scores MT-Bench: 89.9%, HellaSwag: 88.2%, BoolQ: 88.0%, PIQA: 84.4%, Winogrande: 83.2%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than Hermes 3 70B?

Hermes 3 70B is 2.9x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. Hermes 3 70B costs $0.35/M input and $1.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and Hermes 3 70B?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Hermes 3 70B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and Hermes 3 70B?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.35/M), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and Hermes 3 70B?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Hermes 3 70B is developed by Nous Research.

Related comparisons