The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 38.4.

Google · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 38.4, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3 Pro
Google
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
38.4
#76
51.0
#15
Reasoning
38.4
#74
47.5
#26
Coding
24.2
#85
38.8
#18
Agents
15.1
#100
38.0
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3 Pro
Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool use
13.9#106
29.0#16
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

21 reported for Gemini 3 Pro · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Gemini 3 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 11 months newer than Gemini 3 Pro.

Gemini 3 Pro

Nov 18, 2025

10 months ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Pro

Jan 2025

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3 Pro
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 38.4. Gemini 3 Pro is made by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3 Pro compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Global PIQA: 93.4%, GPQA: 91.9%, MMMLU: 91.8%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (38.4 vs 51.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3 Pro is developed by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons