Gemini 3 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 38.1. LongCat-2.5 is 8.6x cheaper per token.
Google · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 38.1, ranking #20 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, LongCat-2.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, LongCat-2.5 is roughly 8.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3 Pro
- you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output
Choose LongCat-2.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 8.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
21 reported for Gemini 3 Pro · 23 for LongCat-2.5
Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while LongCat-2.5 is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).
LongCat-2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Pro is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. LongCat-2.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 3 Pro and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Pro
LongCat-2.5
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.
LongCat-2.5 is 12 months newer than Gemini 3 Pro.
Nov 18, 2025
11 months ago
Nov 1, 2026
3 days ago
11mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while LongCat-2.5's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-2.5's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.
Gemini 3 Pro
LongCat-2.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Pro and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs LongCat-2.5.