The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 31.2.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 31.2, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.7 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
31.2
#104
42.7
#44
Agents
11.0
#102
31.7
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 6 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Mar 3, 2026

6 months ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to 31.2. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores MMMLU: 88.9%, GPQA: 86.9%, VideoMMMU: 84.8%, MMMU-Pro: 76.8%, CharXiv-R: 73.2%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.2 vs 42.7), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons