The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 30.8. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 14.2x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 30.8, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is roughly 14.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

  • cost matters — it's about 14.2x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Google
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
30.8
#131
47.9
#29
Reasoning
31.2
#124
33.1
#109
Agents
10.3
#130
34.1
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Muse Wonder
Vision
17.8#94
25.4#52
Multimodal
22.7#67
25.4#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/1M tokens) is 16.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($1.50/1M tokens) is 13.3x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's 1,000,000 tokens. Only Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 7 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Mar 3, 2026

7 months ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

5 days ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Muse Wonder

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is available from DeepInfra, Google. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 30.8. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores MMMLU: 88.9%, GPQA: 86.9%, VideoMMMU: 84.8%, MMMU-Pro: 76.8%, CharXiv-R: 73.2%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 16.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25/M input and $1.50/M output via deepinfra. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.8 vs 47.9), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.25 vs $4.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons