The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 42.9.

Google · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 42.9, ranking #15 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.9
#52
51.0
#15
Reasoning
44.6
#39
47.5
#26
Coding
30.0
#55
38.8
#18
Agents
23.7
#63
38.0
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool use
22.8#44
29.0#16
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Gemini 3.1 Pro · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

2 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ling 3.1 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2, FrontierSWE).

Ling 3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Gemini 3.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 7 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

7 months ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 42.9. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.9 vs 51.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons