The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Magistral Medium

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 13.1.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 13.1, ranking #39 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.4 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.4
#39
13.1
#246
Reasoning
45.0
#29
13.3
#238
Coding
31.3
#44
3.5
#215
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Magistral Medium
Math
42.4#5
11.4#242
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for Gemini 3.1 Pro · 6 for Magistral Medium

2 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Magistral Medium is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3.1 Pro specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Magistral Medium support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.1 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is 8 months newer than Magistral Medium.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feb 19, 2026

6 months ago

8mo newer
Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Magistral Medium has a cutoff of 2025-06-01.

Magistral Medium has more recent training data (up to 2025-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro (2025-01-31).

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Jan 2025

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

5 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Pro and Magistral Medium side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Magistral Medium
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Magistral Medium.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Magistral Medium?

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 43.4 to 13.1. Gemini 3.1 Pro is made by Google and Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Magistral Medium in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores t2-bench: 99.3%, LiveCodeBench Pro: 96.2%, GPQA: 94.3%, MMMLU: 92.6%, BrowseComp: 85.9%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Magistral Medium?

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Magistral Medium supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Magistral Medium?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.4 vs 13.1), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro and Magistral Medium?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons