Model Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Pro is 2.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash (by Google) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GDPval-AA). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2-Pro is roughly 2.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.5 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.3x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 3.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GDPval-AA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash ($1.50/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash ($9.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input tokens$1.50
Output tokens$9.00
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Pro's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash was released on 2026-05-19, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is 2 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

May 19, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Jan 2026

MiMo-V2-Pro

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $9.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (76.2% vs 57.1%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GDPval-AA score (47.5% vs 45.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash is made by Google and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 83.6%, MMMU-Pro: 83.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 78.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 76.2%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50/M input and $9.00/M output via google. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.50 vs $1.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons