Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 42.0. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 12.9x cheaper per token.
Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 42.0, ranking #29 overall.
The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.
On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 12.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash
- you want predictable pricing at $1.50/M input and $9.00/M output
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 12.9x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CharXiv-R), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash ($1.50/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash ($9.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is limited to 524,288 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.5 Flash was released on 2026-05-19, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash.
May 19, 2026
5 months ago
Oct 19, 2026
0 days ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.
Jan 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.5 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.