The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 22.1.

MiniMax · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 22.1, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#29
22.1
#202
Reasoning
45.8
#34
19.8
#213
Coding
37.8
#23
2.9
#241
Agents
35.6
#23
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
26.8#30
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

-2 days ago

3d newer
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

1 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 22.1. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons