The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 42.0.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 42.0, ranking #24 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.50/M input and $9.00/M output

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.3 and ranks #24 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
42.0
#66
49.3
#24
43.2
#53
37.8
#82
29.5
#62
38.4
#21
28.3
#58
37.2
#17
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$9.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Muse Wonder
31.6#29
26.6#53
29.4#18
19.2#74
32.5#23
26.6#53
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash · 16 for Muse Wonder

1 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder is better at 1 benchmark (DeepSWE 1.1).

Muse Wonder significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash was released on 2026-05-19, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 5 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

May 19, 2026

5 months ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Jan 2026

Muse Wonder

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.3 to 42.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 83.6%, MMMU-Pro: 83.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 78.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 76.2%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.0 vs 49.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash and Muse Wonder?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.