The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 87.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.50/M input and $21.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 87.5x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
Google
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.50 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$21.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live ($3.50/1M tokens) is 58.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live ($21.00/1M tokens) is 116.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
Input tokens$3.50
Output tokens$21.00
Best providerGoogle
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live was released on 2026-08-26, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 0 month newer than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

5 days ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live is available from Google. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $21.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live (Google) and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (InclusionAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live scores FLEURS: 94.5%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 58.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live costs $3.50/M input and $21.00/M output via google. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include input pricing ($3.50 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live is developed by Google and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons