The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2026
License
Proprietary
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 4.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.7 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

Gemini 3.7 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.7 Flash compare to MiMo-V2.5-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 97.0%, Harvey LAB-AA: 90.7%, CharXiv-R: 88.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.8%, LVBench: 85.4%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemini 3.7 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.43/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons